First it was
@astutiumRob, and now it's Helmuts. Who will be your next target I wonder?
I think quite a few people would agree with me that this individual is a legitimate 'target' for the good of all, especially those he may get obsessed over. Also, Denys did a fantastic job at solving a questionable action, which very likely puts Rob Golding's bestie in the frame. This still needs to be resolved and remedied. Also, more information keeps coming in on 'target' number one, which adds to the bigger picture. I am limited in what I can currently disclose about Rob Golding, and I would like to mention that I am not the person whom he has badly affected due to his behaviour. Jeff, I would love to give you 100% of what I am aware of, but I am reminded that the person who has suffered because of him overrides my desire for full exposure. I am sure it will be clarified in full at some point, but only when I get the green light. It is frustrating for me, trust me. One thing Rob did do, which I am pleased about, is his use of "Forceful", "Single-minded",
which directly corroborates/supports the 'allegations' etc, and also shows his cohesive side with his final statement at the bottom of his post as well as his phrasing as if he STILL has some control over her and her 'honour'. I have so far been extremely restrained.
And as with Rob, you're vague about exactly what Helmuts has done to incur your wrath, other than refusing to take your call and sending you a text reply you didn't like. I'm no fan of Helmuts, but I don't blame him.
Helmut caused this current Golding situation with a very provocative post on Acorn, which you have identified already and asked about in a previous post. He is fully aware of what Golding did in 2023 and banned him from his own forum (permanent) and also banned him from any future Domain Summits. He even made a short video stating that a male attendee way overstepped the boundaries with a female attendee he acquainted himself with, giving her his business card, telling her he wanted to act as a consultant and help her with her business, which she believed and trusted was the case. She should not have rang the number on the card.
Yes, the original post was an accurate assessment of the situation between the 2 forums; however, I lightened the negativity in light of hearing Helmuts had referred to Golding in a certain way, which was extremely hostile, so that gave me a rare sense of jubilation when I thought Golding was getting what he deserved. Before I knew what he was responsible for, I did not think people like him existed, especially in a sector like this industry, which is very small, so the mind boggles at how he thought he was going to walk away Scot-Free. Now, the text message he has sent has a line in it which is very provocative and insulting under the circumstances. Also, I was trying to do him a favour and resolve my issue with him in private and not on a forum. Why a forum? because nothing that shows a questionable character will be covered up again where this industry is concerned. Let me be clear, I have zero tolerance and no nostalgia where Meskonis is concerned, and he comes crashing down, then it is no less than he deserves.
Re-editing and giving an accurate assessment like the first post stated. I wont be attempting any further humour on this forum. I have always tried to see the positive side where Meskonis is concerned but those days are gone.
Now you've flip-flopped back to your original position.
You really need to get a grip. If you can't, then I suggest you ask someone less aggressive and more consistent to write your posts for you. I'm sure Brian would be up for it.
It would really be nice to speak with the gentleman you are referring to, but he seems to have lost his tongue. It won't last, I'm sure of it. Regarding aggression, it could be a lot worse, so I consider myself to have a very firm grip already
Now, just to clarify, I know you still do not have the full picture, but I really do need to get permission to disclose information that could do harm to someone else who has suffered enough already. I am aware I seem to be 'all over the place' with certain posts, but do bear in mind that I have to be mindful of using words that an innocent party would find distressing, even though I want to hit the big red button where Golding is concerned.
Sometimes I'm told I over react but my patience with this fool has come to an abrupt end. I can understand your frustration that your initial Acorn post resulted in massive fallout and casualties which inevitably effected your silly summit attendance. I do sincerely hope the Domain Summit collapses and his forums fail because in my opinion he is doing more damage that good to our namespace with consistent ludicrous comments, statements and quite frankly sheer stupidity severely restricting the potential of what could be. I promise, I will challenge his Acorn and DNForum with my own more relevant to 2025 variants and I will even challenge the summit with an alternative event in the not too distant future. As the saying goes, 'I have a fiddle of gold against your soul because I think I'm better that you' He should think before he texts.
.